
PERSPECTIVES 
The GM public debate: Context and communication strategies
What have we learned from the United Kingdom debate about the importance of the public communication of science?
Rosie Hails & Julian Kinderlerer
Nature Reviews Genetics 4, 819 (October 2003)
NEWS
UK public opposes government on transgenic crops
Nature 425, 331 (25 September 2003)
NEWS
UK government caught in GM dilema
Nature Biotechnology 21, 957 (September 2003)
NEWS
UK experts map out route to licensing transgenic crops
Nature 425, 358 (24 July 2003)
EDITORIAL
Debate, what debate?
The UK government is squandering the chance to canvass public opinion on one of the hottest controversies in science.
Nature 423, 669 (12 June 2003)
NEWS
Public input sought on transgenic farming
Nature 423, 627 (12 June 2003)
NEWS
Hostilities resume over future of GM crops
Nature 419, 327 (26 September 2002)
|

NEWS FEATURE
The battlefields of Britain
With its farm-scale trials of genetically modified crops, Britain has taken ecological studies of farming practices into new territory. But the trials are the focus of intense controversy. Trisha Gura spoke to the scientists involved.
Nature 412, 670763 (2001)

OPINION
Missing the big picture
Our understanding of the likely ecological impact of genetically modified crops is incomplete. But these holes in our knowledge are symptomatic of a wider failure adequately to address the science of sustainable agriculture.
Nature 421, 675 (13 February 2003)
NEWS FEATURE
Chinese agribiotech: Against the grain
China has long been a keen supporter of transgenic agriculture, and is still pouring money into developing the technology. So why are applications to market new genetically modified crops in limbo? Colin Macilwain investigates.
Nature 422, 111112 (13 March 2003)
NEWS
India debates results of its first transgenic cotton crop
Nature 421, 681 (13 February 2003)
2002 IN CONTEXT
Agribiotech: More heat than light
Nature 420, 730731 (19 December 2002)
|